Fact Check
Every opposition claim from the March 26 meeting — debunked
At the March 26 Board of Supervisors Special Meeting, opposition speakers attacked the IVDC data center along four vectors: the CEQA approval process, a supposed 4-degree temperature increase, grid stability fears based on Lake Tahoe, and the claim that the AI industry is a bubble. Each argument collapses under the weight of engineering data, court rulings, and economic facts.
The 4-Degree Temperature Myth
“Data centers cause a 4°F ambient temperature increase in the local community.”
The “4-degree” figure comes from IPCC SSP5 global climate models projecting planetary warming by 2100 — not localized data center heat. The IVDC uses advanced evaporative cooling (not air-cooled systems). Emergency diesel generators have been reduced 85% — from 132 to just 20 — with primary backup via 862 MWh BESS (220 Tesla Megapacks). The facility includes 191-foot voluntary setbacks from the nearest homes, a 20-foot landscaped acoustic berm, and heavy equipment positioned more than 1,000 feet from sensitive receptors. Independent studies show noise and thermal impact below existing ambient levels.
The Lake Tahoe Grid Myth
“Data centers are ‘soaking up all of Nevada’s energy’ — the same will happen here.”
The Tahoe situation involves Liberty Utilities, a California investor-owned utility purchasing 75% of wholesale power from NV Energy (Nevada). NV Energy declined to renew the contract (expiring May 2027) due to its own in-state data center demand. This is a completely different utility, grid topology, and regulatory framework. The IVDC: operates under IID (not an IOU), builds its own private 330 MW substation (doesn’t plug into the neighborhood grid), operates under a strict interruptible service contract (IID can cut power instantly), and has 862 MWh BESS that islands the facility during grid stress — removing 330 MW of demand and acting as a grid shock absorber.
The AI Industry Viability Myth
“OpenAI lost $16 billion — the AI industry is a bubble and the data center will be abandoned.”
Operating losses at individual software companies are standard CapEx-heavy growth economics (Amazon lost money for 20 consecutive quarters before becoming the world’s most valuable company). The IVDC’s civic revenue is locked to physical infrastructure, not software profitability. The buildings, substations, and tax obligations exist regardless of which tenants occupy the facility.
| Revenue Stream | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Capital Investment | $10,000,000,000 |
| One-Time Sales Tax | $72,500,000 |
| Annual Property Tax | $28,750,000 |
| Annual IID Net Revenue | Up to $30,000,000 |
| Construction Jobs | 1,688 union at $40–$65/hr |
| Permanent Tech Positions | 100–200 |
What $28.75M in annual property tax buys
442 teacher salaries or 14 fully-funded fire companies. Every year. Locked to physical infrastructure that doesn’t disappear when a software company’s stock price dips.
The CEQA “Bypass” Myth
“The project bypassed environmental review through a loophole.”
Ministerial approval is the legally correct pathway for I-2 heavy industrial zoned land. This is not a loophole — it is the standard process under California law for projects that conform to existing zoning. Judge Anderholt ruled the City of Imperial’s case “legally insufficient” (February 27, 2026), confirming the approval was lawful.
The $83M CCV greenmail precedent
Communities for a Better Environment and the Comite Civico del Valle (CCV) demanded $83 million over 30 years to drop their CEQA challenge against the Hell’s Kitchen lithium project — a textbook “greenmail” shakedown. The same playbook is being deployed against the IVDC. Meanwhile, SB 887 now threatens all data centers statewide by creating new litigation vectors for environmental groups.
Water: The Purple Pipe Reality
“The facility will drain 750,000 gallons of precious drinking water daily.”
Zero potable water consumed. The entire cooling system uses reclaimed municipal wastewater via a closed-loop purple pipe system. The developer is investing $10 million in local water plant upgrades plus $3 million annually to purchase reclaimed water. Net benefit to the Salton Sea — on-site treatment processes more wastewater than consumed, with surplus clean water flowing to the watershed. Plus a $1.5 million binding commitment to Salton Sea restoration.
The Real Cost of Obstruction
| Category | Amount |
|---|---|
| Foregone Construction Wages | $274,400,000 |
| Lost School & Civic Tax Revenue | $32,900,000 |
| Total Documented Economic Losses | $307,300,000 |
| IID “Poison Pill” Prepayment Demand | $4,000,000,000 |
Legal action underway
The developer has filed a federal civil rights lawsuit (§1983) against the City of Imperial and named officials, alleging deliberate obstruction of a lawfully approved project. The $307.3 million in documented damages continues to grow with every month of delay.
The facts are clear. Vote for accountability on June 2.
Every claim has been debunked. Every dollar of damage has been documented. The only question left is who you vote for.
Take Action